| 



























 |
In
August of 1994, Donald Sykes, the Director of the Office of Community Services (OCS),
chartered the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Monitoring
and Assessment Task Force. The task force created six broad goals and a list of direct
measures for members of the Community Action Network to use when responding to GPRA. The revised goals and measures, effective October 1, 1999, are listed below.
They are also available as a downloadable PDF file (PDF:
17KB, 4 pages). A chart that tracks the changes made to the original October, 1996 document is available here.
OCS Monitoring and Assessment Task Force
National Goals and Outcome Measures
Effective October 1, 1999
For each goal that corresponds to the work your agency does,
select at least one measure to report on, based on a current needs assessment survey. If
you feel that none of the measures under a particular goal is a good measure of the work
actually done by your agency, create a measure that more accurately reflects the work you
do. In addition, note that some of the measures could easily apply to other goals as well
as the one under which they are listed; use them wherever they seem most appropriate to
you.
In measures below, number, wherever it appears, is to be expressed in two parts: the
actual count, and the baseline total. For example, when the measure is number of
households maintaining employment, express it as a factor of the total number of
households served by the agency (e.g., 27 out of 86). Do not indicate percentages (e.g.,
31.4% or even 31 out of 100, unless your baseline total is actually 100 households); the
data need to be aggregated with that of other agencies before percentages are calculated.
GOAL 1. (Self-sufficiency) LOW-INCOME PEOPLE
BECOME MORE SELF-SUFFICIENT
GOAL 2. (Community Revitalization) THE
CONDITIONS IN WHICH LOW-INCOME PEOPLE LIVE ARE IMPROVED
GOAL 3. (Community Revitalization) LOW-INCOME
PEOPLE OWN A STAKE IN THEIR COMMUNITY
GOAL 4. PARTNERSHIPS AMONG SUPPORTERS AND
PROVIDERS OF SERVICES TO LOW-INCOME PEOPLE ARE ACHIEVED
GOAL 5. AGENCIES INCREASE THEIR CAPACITY TO
ACHIEVE RESULTS
GOAL 6. (Family stability) LOW-INCOME PEOPLE,
ESPECIALLY VULNERABLE POPULATIONS, ACHIEVE THEIR POTENTIAL BY STRENGTHENING FAMILY AND
OTHER SUPPORTIVE SYSTEMS
GOAL 1: (SELF-SUFFICIENCY)
LOW-INCOME PEOPLE BECOME MORE SELF-SUFFICIENT
Direct measures:
- Number of participants seeking employment who obtain it [as compared with the total
number of participants].
- Number of participants maintaining employment for a full twelve months.
- Number of households in which adult members obtain and maintain employment for at least
ninety days.
- Number of households with an annual increase in the number of hours of employment.
- Number of households gaining health care coverage through employment.
- Number of households experiencing an increase in an annual income as a result of
earnings.
- Number of households experiencing an increase in annual income as a result of receiving
allowable tax credits, such as the earned income and childcare tax credits.
- Number of custodial households who experience an increase in annual income as a result
of regular child support payments.
- Number of participating families moving from substandard housing into stable standard
housing, as compared with the total number of participating families.
- Number of households which obtain and/or maintain home ownership.
- Number of minority households which obtain and/or maintain home ownership.
- Number of people progressing toward literacy and/or GED.
- Number of people making progress toward post-secondary degree or vocational training.
- Other outcome measure(s) specific to the work of your agency.
Survey question measures:
- Number of clients who consider themselves more self-sufficient since participating in
services or activities of the agency.
- Number of clients reporting an increase in income since participating in the services of
the agency.
Scale measures:
- Number of households which demonstrated movement up one or more steps on a scale or
matrix measuring self-sufficiency
- Number of households achieving positive movement in self-sufficiency as demonstrated by
an increase of at least one point in an overall score of a Family Development Scale.
- Number of households achieving stability in the _________ dimension of a Family
Development Matrix.
GOAL 2: (COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION)
THE CONDITIONS IN WHICH LOW-INCOME PEOPLE LIVE ARE IMPROVED
Direct Measures:
- Number of accessible, living wage jobs created and/or retained.
- Increase in assessed value of homes as a result of rehabilitation projects.
- Increase in proportion of state and federal funds allocated for meeting emergency and
long-term needs of the low-income population.
- Increase in access to community services and resources by low-income people.
- Increase in available housing stock through new construction.
- Increase in the availability and affordability of essential services, e.g.
transportation, medical care, child care.
- Other outcome measure(s) specific to the work done by your agency.
Survey question measures:
- Number of households who believe the agency has helped improve the conditions in which
they live.
Scale measures:
- Number of communities which demonstrated movement up one or more steps on a scale or
matrix measuring community self-sufficiency, community health, or community vitality.
- Number of communities achieving stability in the _____________ dimension of the
Community Scaling Tool.
GOAL 3: (COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION)
LOW-INCOME PEOPLE OWN A STAKE IN THEIR COMMUNITY
Direct measures:
- Number of households owning or actively participating in the management of their
housing.
- Amount of "community investment" brought into the community by the Network and
targeted to low-income people.
- Increase in minority businesses owned.
- Increase in access to capital by minorities.
- Increased level of participation of low-income people in advocacy and intervention
activities regarding funding levels, distribution policies, oversight, and distribution
procedures for programs and funding streams targeted for the low-income community.
- Other outcome measure(s) specific to the work done by your agency.
Survey question measures:
- Number of households participating or volunteering in one or more groups.
- Number of households who say they feel they are part of the community.
Scale measures
- Number of communities which demonstrated movement up one or more steps on a scale or
matrix measuring community self-sufficiency, community health, or community vitality.
- Number of communities achieving stability in the __________ dimension of the Community
Scaling Tool.
GOAL 4:
PARTNERSHIPS AMONG SUPPORTERS AND PROVIDERS OF SERVICES TO LOW-INCOME PEOPLE ARE
ACHIEVED
Direct measures:
- Number of partnerships established and/or maintained with other public and private
entities to mobilize and leverage resources to provide services to low-income people.
- Number of partnerships established and/or maintained with other public and private
entities to complete the continuum of care for low-income people.
- Number of partnerships established and/or maintained with other public and private
entities which ensure ethnic, cultural, and other special needs considerations are
appropriately included in the delivery service system.
- Other outcome measure(s) specific to the partnerships created by local agencies.
Survey question measures:
- Number of principal partners who are satisfied with the partnership.
- Partners rating of the responsiveness of the agency.
Scale Measures:
- Number of agencies which demonstrated movement up one or more steps on a scale or matrix
measuring agency partnership capacity.
- Number of agencies achieving stability in the _________ dimension of an agency
partnership capacity scaling tool.
- Number of agencies that achieve and maintain commitments from other service and resource
partners to carry out agency mission.
- Number of agencies that establish and maintain commitments to provide resources to
partner organizations that serve agency customers.
- Number of agencies that establish and maintain coordination of agency and non-agency
resources to create a programmatic continuum of services with outcome-based objectives
establishes and maintains a selection process which ensures that low-income community
members are elected in a public process.
GOAL 5:
AGENCIES INCREASE THEIR CAPACITY TO ACHIEVE RESULTS
Direct measures:
- Total dollars mobilized by the agency.
- Total dollars mobilized by the agency as compared with CSBG dollars.
- Number of boards making changes as a result of a periodic organizational assessment.
- Number of programs which have become more effective as a result of research and data
(their own as well as others).
- Number of programs which have become more effective as a result of needs assessment
surveys.
- Number of families having their situation improved as a result of comprehensive
developmental services.
- Increase in community revitalization as a result of programs.
- Number of agencies increasing their number of funding sources and increasing the total
value of resources available for services to low-income people.
- Number of agencies leveraging non-CSBG resources with CSBG resources at a ratio greater
than 1:1.
- Number of agencies where board composition accurately represents the ethnic diversity of
the service territory.
- Number of agencies where customers served accurately represents the ethnic diversity of
the service territory.
- Number of agencies where staffing component accurately represents the ethnic diversity
of the service territory.
- Number of development contacts as a result of outreach programs.
- Number of special populations showing improvement as a result of programs aimed at the
population.
- Number of clients showing improvement as a result of emergency services received.
- Other outcome measure(s) specific to the work done by local agencies.
Scale measures:
- Number of agencies that achieve and maintain compliance with all applicable Federal,
State, and local statutes, regulations, and requirements.
- Number of agencies that achieve and maintain a governance process that is inclusive,
representative of, and accountable to the community.
- Number of agencies that achieve and maintain a workforce environment which empowers and
develops its employees, has open communications, pays its employees a living wage, and is
mission-driven.
- Number of agencies which achieve and maintain a planning, measurement, and evaluation
system which creates a programmatic, continuum of services with outcomes-based objectives,
and where the measurements of programs are used to improve services.
- Number of agencies that achieve and maintain communication and feedback processes that
engage all stakeholders.
- Number of agencies that establish and maintain a process where evaluations are used to
improve services.
GOAL 6: (Family stability)
LOW-INCOME PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY VULNERABLE POPULATIONS, ACHIEVE THEIR POTENTIAL BY
STRENGTHENING FAMILY AND OTHER SUPPORTIVE SYSTEMS
Direct measures:
- Number of aged households maintaining an independent living situation.
- Number of disabled or medically challenged persons maintaining an independent living
situation.
- Number of households in crisis whose emergency needs are ameliorated.
- Number of participating families moving from homeless or transitional housing into
stable standard housing.
- Number of households in which there has been an increase in donation of time to
volunteer activities (not mandated by welfare-to-work programs).
- Number of households in which there has been an increase in childrens involvement
in extracurricular activities.
- Number of high consumption households realizing a reduction in energy burden
- Number of households moving from cultural isolation to involvement with their cultural
community.
- Other outcome measure(s) specific to the work done by your agency.
Survey question measure:
- Number of households indicating improved family functioning since participating in the
services or activities of the agency.
Scale measures:
- Number of households moving from crisis to stability on one dimension of a scale.
- Number of households moving from vulnerability to stability on one dimension of a scale.
- Number of households moving from a condition of crisis to a condition of vulnerability
on one dimension of a scale.
|